Autonomy in Public Governance: Promise, Pitfalls, and the Path Forward

Autonomy in public governance is often hailed as a cornerstone of democratic administration and effective decentralization. It grants public institutions, agencies, or sub-national governments the ability to operate independently, making decisions tailored to their unique contexts without undue interference from central authorities. In theory, this enhances efficiency, fosters innovation, and strengthens citizen responsiveness.

Yet autonomy is a double-edged sword. Without the right checks and balances, it can hinder accountability, fragment policy efforts, and even encourage corruption. This article unpacks the concept of autonomy in governance, critically examines its drawbacks, and offers practical recommendations for striking a balance between independence and oversight.

Understanding Autonomy in Public Governance

Autonomy typically manifests in two main forms:

• Administrative autonomy: the freedom of public agencies to manage internal affairs without external interference.
• Political autonomy: the ability of sub-national or quasi-independent entities — such as local governments, regulatory bodies, or universities — to make policy decisions that may differ from those of the central government.

Supporters of autonomy argue that devolving power enables tailored governance, promotes local participation, and enhances institutional impartiality. Landmark studies like Ostrom (1990) have long shown that local governance can be more responsive to community needs. Similarly, the independence of institutions like central banks and electoral commissions has been associated with improved policy performance and credibility.

The Benefits: Why Autonomy Matters

Evidence from various sectors and countries suggests that autonomy can significantly improve governance outcomes:

• Economic management: Countries with independent central banks often enjoy better inflation control.
• Market regulation: Autonomous regulatory agencies are more likely to resist political interference and ensure fair competition.
• Service delivery: In education and healthcare, local autonomy enables service customization to local demographics.
• Federal harmony: Autonomy in federations fosters inclusivity, recognizes regional identities, and reduces ethnic or political tensions.

The Challenges: When Autonomy Goes Wrong

Despite these benefits, autonomy can introduce serious governance challenges if not carefully managed.

1. Lack of Accountability

Autonomous entities may operate in a vacuum of oversight. For example, independent regulatory agencies have been critiqued for suffering from “democratic deficits,” where unelected technocrats make far-reaching decisions. In decentralized systems, local elites can dominate decision-making, fostering clientelism and eroding public trust.

2. Fragmentation and Inefficiency

Multiple autonomous bodies can lead to policy duplication, inefficiencies, and poor coordination. The U.S. response to COVID-19 is a case in point — state and federal authorities struggled to align efforts, resulting in delays and inconsistent policies.

3. Corruption and Patronage

Where oversight is weak, autonomy can be a cover for corruption. Some countries have used autonomous agencies to expand political patronage, bypassing transparency and accountability norms.

4. Legal and Constitutional Disputes

Ambiguity in the distribution of powers can trigger jurisdictional disputes. In federations, disagreements between national and sub-national governments can delay implementation and paralyze critical reforms.

Case Studies: Lessons from the Field

📍 Nigeria: Federal Decentralization

Nigeria’s constitutional structure grants its 36 states significant autonomy, especially over budgeting, public service delivery, and natural resource management (outside offshore oil). While this allows states to innovate, it has also exposed governance weaknesses.

• In Cross River State, the state government launched the ambitious “Superhighway” project with little stakeholder consultation, leading to environmental concerns and a lack of federal environmental approvals — stalling the project and wasting resources.
• In Ekiti and Osun States, successive governments have been accused of inflating contracts and mismanaging bailout funds meant for salary payments.
• Conversely, Lagos State has leveraged its relative autonomy to develop an internally generated revenue base and attract investment through public-private partnerships in transport and housing.

Getting Autonomy Right: Key Recommendations

To manage the risks without discarding the benefits, public governance systems must be thoughtfully designed. Here’s how:

✅ Strengthen Accountability Mechanisms

Introduce regular audits, performance reviews, and public reporting. Independent oversight bodies and citizen engagement platforms can ensure responsiveness and prevent abuse of power.

✅ Clarify Legal Mandates

Clearly define roles and responsibilities to prevent jurisdictional overlap. Intergovernmental coordination bodies can be instrumental during crises requiring a unified response.

✅ Build Institutional Capacity

Autonomy must be matched with capability. Invest in skilled personnel, financial resources, and administrative tools to ensure autonomous bodies are professionally run and outcome-oriented.

✅ Promote Transparency

Require open procurement, digital reporting, and public access to information. Anti-corruption agencies must have authority over all levels of government, including autonomous units.

✅ Encourage Strategic Coordination

Autonomy shouldn’t mean isolation. National governments can issue policy guidelines, create shared platforms, and host regular coordination meetings to align local and central priorities.

Conclusion: A Balanced Approach to Autonomy

Autonomy is not inherently good or bad — it’s all about how it’s implemented and managed. When combined with strong accountability, legal clarity, and institutional support, autonomy can be a force for innovation, inclusion, and effective governance.

But left unchecked, it can just as easily breed inefficiency, corruption, and fragmentation.

At the Centre for Public Sector Governance (CPSG), we believe that the future of effective governance lies in smart autonomy — freedom with responsibility, independence with oversight, and local action within a coherent national framework.